The review of the Byrd Finch consists of : |
![]() |
From the Spyderco webpage on the Byrd Finch
The smallest folder in the byrd line with all stainless steel construction is the Finch. It is engineered to yield maximum cutting performance with a blade under two-inches. A ball chain threaded through the lanyard hole (included) can be used as a keychain or lets you attach the knife to a purse, pocket or zipper pull. Designing a small knife that feels secure in an adult-sized hand can be challenging. The Finch brings several elements together to elevate ergonomics and create purchase in the user’s hand. The inclusion of jimping (texturing) along the spine and a finger choil on the bottom of the handle let you wrap your hand around the folder for remarkable control and precision over the cutting edge. The back lock is positioned midway on the spine facilitating one hand opening and closing. The Finch’s blade is high carbon 8Cr13MoV stainless steel that is hollow-ground and available either fully serrated or plainedged. It is clipless.
The overall length of the Finch is 4 3/8" (111 mm), with a blade length of 1 7/8" (48 mm). The length closed is 2 1/2" (64 mm) with a cutting edge of 1 9/16" (40 mm). The weight is 0.5 oz (15 g) with a hole diameter of 11/32" (9 mm). The blade thickness is 5/64" (48 mm). The primary hollow grind tapers to an edge which is 0.017 (1)" thick and ground at 12.9 (2) degrees per side. This one has a FRN grip, it is also available in a stainless steel grip. The blade steel is 8C13CrMoV a high carbon stainless steel with a high hardness and relatively low carbide volume.
With a few passes on 0.5 micron chromium/aluminum oxide to remove the burr, the Finch cut 3/8 inch hemp with 14.5 (5) and 23.5 (5) lbs on a slice through two inches of blade and a push cut respectively..
The Finch tips tapers through 0.38" at an angle of 5.9 degrees. On a 50 lbs push it sinks to a depth of 245 (8) pages into a standard phonebook.
As a paring knife the Finch
has has solid cutting abiilty and handling as it is very light with a slim and
narrow tip. The handle could be a little longer for better control but since
paring work is low in applied force it isn't a huge
disadvantage. The blade is also a little short which is an issue peeling
large vegetables but isn't a factor on apples and potatos.
The edge could also be more acute and thinner for such work to raise the cutting
ability but it is still well above average for a small folding knife
and given the hollow
grind it would be easy to adjust the angle flat to the blade for an optimal
paring profile.
As a utility knife the main issue with
the Finch is just the size. As in general there are few tasks outside of the
capability of the knife that can't be solved with imagination and creativity.
One larger cuts of meat for example as in filleting the meat off a section of
cod, the knife basically has to skin off the fillet because the blade is too
short to simply remove it in one cut. It is however still more functional than
very heavy knives with really thick cross sections but the time and effort to do
such cutting is a many to one disadvantage over knives with suitable blade
lengths. It is also difficult to make clean cuts to a cutting board so most work
is done with a draw cut backwards through the material. This is limited to
fairly small foods like green onions, larger vegetables like turnips are very
difficult to section with the Finch.
In general there were no issues noted with corrosion in kitchen use even when the blade was not immediately rinsed after cutting acidic foods.
Cutting light brush, the Finch is limited due to size
obviously. A larger folders like the Military
can just pop off light brush with light chops but this does little with a knife
the size of the Finch. To trim light alders with the Finch, if the wood is
really small, under a quarter of an inch or so, the Finch can
generally cut it with a
sharp pull backward. The larger alders and bent and the Finch just pressed
through them. It made removal of a few dozen patches of alder much easier than
trying to pull them up by hand and the knife was uneffected by the cutting.
For carving, the Finch works well for precision cutting being
light in the hand and offering high cutting ability. The tip is also very slim
and easily does detailed work. It has little prying ability in wood so any
hollow removal is done by a lot of cross hatching and cutting out the wood
rather than aggressive prying to dig out the wood. The only significant downside
is there is limited ability
to apply heavy force due to the size of the handle and there would also be
concerns about the pivot if maximal force was used by an average adult male
anyway. However it still is very
useful for precision carving and shaping such as
making small tools like a bark spud. This is a tapered
wooden prybar which is used to aid in bark removal. The spud can't cut the bark
which is useful to obtain large sheets for construction, just make a couple of
starting cuts with the knife. The spud is also more robust than the tips of fine
knives and thus can aggressively pry off thicker barks more readily.
Barks heavy with pitch have many uses as the sap can be used to make glue by
heating it and mixing charcoal to strengthen and will also burn very readily and
thus can serve as an intermediate fuel while larger pieces of wood are gathered.
A small piece of sap heavy bark can provide enough heat to burn even fresh woods
which are an inch or so thick. The spud makes gathering it very easy, just cut
well away from it with the knife and pry off the piece. If it gets on the knife
it is very difficult to clean and would be a real mess in the lock.
For fire: the wood carving ability rapidly produces a pile of
fine shavings and combined with some thick pitch bark provides a fire which will
readily burn for a half an hour. This gives time to split up any gathered
thicker wood. The Finch is too small to do this directly and thus wedges are
carved if necessary and used in either existing cracks in the wood or driven
into cuts made by the Finch.
The main use of the finch is on small precision cutting. It has a very fine
point and the cutting ability is relatively high in general due to the grind. It
worked very well to create a pair of improvised sandals to allow some eager
nephews some time playing in a local river and sparing a pair of decent
sneakers from getting water logged. The knife easily trims two soles from a
placemat, cuts a few sections of rag to make pseudo laces, trimms the holes for
the laces and binds up the two sandals. A much more durable and functional
sandal can be made from non-steel belted tires.
As a rough check of edge retention, the Finch was benchmarked against a non-name
chinese stainless steel folder which had an edge at 0.021 (2)" thick and ground
at 21 (1) degrees per side. It is the blade shown on the right. No distinct
microbevels were used and the blades were finished on 600 DMT 1/4" stone. The
cutting was done on a slice with 3 cm of edge through the ridges on 1/8" thick
cardboard. The blades were basically roughly sharpened with a time constraint of
one minute per blade to simulate an actual field sharpening during working
conditions. The sharpness was
measured by cutting light cord under 45 grams of tension. The
results :
The results of the fit show the Finch to be quite superior in both initial sharpness and extended aggression, not a surprise. It was about 50% sharper initially and was able to cut about 150% more material before reaching the same level of blunting. As noted this was a time constrained sharpening and neither blade is close to optimal sharpness. Both would of course shave air hair and push cut newsprint initially however they could be improved with more time spent to minimize the burr. The no name was especially very difficult to sharpen because it formed a burr quite easily. This can also be noted in detail in the full data because there is little initial blunting responce :
Cardboard | No name | Finch |
---|---|---|
meters | centimeters | |
0 | 63 (7) | 40 (3) |
0.2 | 63 (5) | 40 (4) |
0.5 | 60 (5) | |
0.7 | 70 (5) | 50 (5) |
1.1 | 83 (7) | |
1.6 | 75 (8) | 63 (5) |
2.2 | 83 (7) | |
3.4 | 93 (6) | 65 (5) |
4.6 | 105 (9) | |
5.8 | 125 (9) | 75 (7) |
8.2 | 125 (12) | |
11.1 | 175 (15) | 95 (6) |
14.1 | 213 (18) | |
17.1 | 283 (21) | 125 (12) |
20.0 | 315 (27) | |
23.0 | 390 (39) | 188 (21) |
Note that edge retention is quite sensitive to edge angle, both primary and secondary so this isn't a comparison of the steels but rather of the knives with stock edge angles, well the no-name was slightly modifed.
The thin and acute edge of the Finch allows it to be honed readily on most jigs and v-rods. Freehanded it responded well to a variety of hones.
The lock back of the Finch was stable under spine impacts, torques and white knuckling, consistent with the performance of other Byrd knives.
The Finch is a keychain class knife which is near weightless due to the FRN handle. It doesn't have a clip and comes with a small chain. It has little drag even in a shirt pocket and rarely generates an adverse reaction even to people usually not friendly towards knives as it is so small.
The only significant issue with the grip is the size. This is a very small knife and thus there were issues of leverage if the cutting required heavy force, but of course in such situations a larger folder would in general be more productive. For its size the grip was very ergonomic and secure.
The Finch works very well as a keychain knife, handling precision cutting with ease. It can also be pushed into heavier work as noted, though when cutting moves beyond heavy cardboard a large grip would be more productive to reduce fatigue in the hand during the cutting. There were no issues with corrosion resistance of the steel or complaints about edge retention, see the blade materials section on 8C13CrMoV for more information on the steel. The lock was secure and stable approaching forces which looked to be able to significantly damage the handle.
Comments can be emailed to cliffstamp@[REMOVE]cutleryscience.com and made to the following :
More information can be obtained at the Spyderco website.
Last updated : 08 : 20 : 2007 | Originally written: 07 : 20 : 2006 |
Up | Copyright (c) 2007 : Cliff Stamp |