Garden Machete from Japan Woodworker


This review consists of :

Specifications

The Garden Machete is made from hand-forged Hitachi Yasuki "white" steel (64 HRC) laminated to a low carbon steel. The handle is made from Japanese White Oak, angled and flared at the end. The scabbard is wood covered vinyl. The blade length is 8" and the overal length is 15" . Some specifications on this one :

More specifics on the grind, it is a chisel grind, hollow relief on the back, the front has a short flat primary grind and a secondary convex bevel which starts at 15 degrees and tapers to 30 degrees (inclusive) at the edge. There is some discussion on the specifications and general thoughts on use in the video linked to in the right.

Initial impressions :

Stock testing : main

Comparing the rough carving ability to a #1260 Mora on finger jointed pine (a very soft wood) the Garden Machete fares well and easily produces a pile of shavings as noted in the picture on the right. Cutting 14 points with each blade on the pine using moderate to heavy force (25-50 lbs) the average number of cuts to make a two inch point point produced and average advantage of a 50 (10)% cutting advantage for the Mora. The reason why the spread is to large (+/- 10) is that on the first few cuts the technique with the Garden Machete was a bit off. Since the cutting is done with the chisel grind down (for a right handed person) then there will be a tendancy to bite in too deep, so deep that the cut can not be completed. This is avoided simply by altering the angle of attack of the cutting. Basically just adjust the angle the blade is to the wood until a smooth cut can be made with a comfortable amount of force. Of course the same thing has to be done regardless of the grind, however it is just more likely to angle too deep with the chisel grind as it will cut with any angle regardless of the approach because the grind angle is zero on the back.

The Garden Machete was compared to an ESEE Junglas chopping some local woods, some fresh and some seasoned between 2-5" in thickness a few things were noted quickly :

This performance isn't surprising given the weight and heft of the nata is similar to the Junglas. Cutting the small pile of wood as shown in the image on the right there was no statistical difference between the two blades in terms of the number of chops required.

However there was a fairly large difference noted in regards to fatigue rates between the two blades as the Garden Machete was more fluid in the wood. As noted in the video on the right this difference is fairly dramatic. This reducing binding or sticking is due to the nata having

On pieces of wood where the Junglas had to be rocked out of the wood, the Garden Machete comes out with at most just a little effort on a pull. However even though it has thicker stock and a heavier primary grind the acute edge angle on the garden machete compensates and produces a strong cutting ability.

Moving on to some scrap construction lumber, the Garden Machete was again compared to the Junglas. Both blades were used to cut some strapping, some stock pine, some plywood and some OSB. This was more of a check on edge durability than chopping ability as the chopping ability was identical as on the actual fresh woods but the lumber in in general harder to cut as it has

Working through the dozens of pieces of wood on the right there were no issues until a fairly sloppy cut was made through a large knot in the pine and the edge did turn. The dent was pretty severe, it was about half an inch wide and 1/32" of an inch deep into the edge grind. Chisel grinds are more susceptible to this type of damage because they are asymmetrically loaded due to the asymmetrical nature of the bevel. However in order to turn the bevel then the cut had to be done in the worse case scenario

Working through the above chopping and much further work a rather curious aspect was noted which was that the blade was not turning as much in the wood as would be expected due to the chisel grind. Now to be clear the blade is asymmetric and a difference is felt when chopping from the left as opposed to the right but the difference was not as much as expected. Examining the blade carefully it is obvious why this is the case. As noted in the video on the right the blade is skewed in the handle and this essentially presents the blade to the wood as if it was a traditional v-grind. This is assumed to be an intentional feature however it is ot included in the description of the promotional material on the website. It does make a fairly significant effect when chopping as it balances the grind and leaves the only asymmetry due to the edge bevel alone.

Food

The Garden Machete is not designed to be a kitchen knife but does have a number of features which make it quite suitable for such work :

With a nice sharp edge it easily cuts tomatoes, cucumbers, breads and meats, all foods which are soft and or open up easily when they are cut are readily processed by the Garden Machete. It is a bit clumsy to use as a paring knife as it is so wide but basically it is just a very thick cleaver and as long as it is used on foods which do not wedge significantly it performs well. of course it is much heavier than a normal kitchen knife but for a small amount of material it is pleasing to use for such foods.

However if the Garden Machete is used on on thicker materials like potato, turnip, melon and pineapple then two things are noticed very quickly :

On very thick foods like a fresh pineapple it becomes very difficult to use, almost to the point it is impossible to slice, though it can be chopped up if you have enough skill. For such foods it is readily outperformed by the Junglas, and of course a traditional kitchen knife. But for rough preparation, around camp and outside, again it can easily roughly chop large fruits and vegetables to chunks.

Utility

On some general utility cutting :

The garden machete handles it easily, aside from the point it does not have a distinct point so starting the cuts can be difficult on some cutting such as starting a cut on a pop bottle, but once the cuts are started the fairly acute edge does cut very well as long as the materials are not very binding as otherwise the blade will bind excessively due to the heavy wedge nature of the primary grind. But again, similar to the thicker vegetables, it is easier to chop most of these materials than actually slice them, the plastic zip ties for example can be easily lopped into sections far easier than slicing through them.

Using the garden machete cutting up some cardboard a few interesting things were noted :

Thus comparing it to the Junglas In between those two the blades were about equivalent. As an aside, the garden machete worked well as a scoring tool with the leading square point.

Field

Using the garden machete to split some wood, it was first used on construction lumber. A few interesting things were noted :

After splitting a few dozen pieces of 2x4, 2x6 and 2x10 from 4-6" long up to 12-16" long the basic conclusion reached was that if the garden machete could not chop split it then it was not efficient to try to pound it through like using a froe. The twisting action of the chisel grind can be countered by using wrist torque and altering the presentation of the blade to the wood but it isn't easy or comfortable compared to a symmetric ground blade and once the blade starts to turn it will readily cut through the wood rather than split the grain.

Using the garden machete to work some deadfall and clearing some small dead saplings, a few things were noted comparing it to the Cold Steel Magnum Kukri Machete :

The reduced angle on the garden machete (30 degrees inclusive) vs the kukri machete (40 degrees inclusive) made an obvious difference in ease of cutting which was felt trimming the branches. On the softer and younger branches it was more like the garden machete was cutting while the kukri machete was chopping. The durability issues are as noted in the video on the right due to the asymmetric loading of the bevel due to the chisel grind.

There was however a more significant issue which is that the handle on the handle on the garden machete cracked during the harder limbing. The wood split after about five minutes of chopping on some very hard limbs. Closer inspection later showed that the pins in the handle are essentially nails and they penetrated from one side almost to the other and end just under the surface of the wood leaving about 1/8" of wood above the nail head. The fracture started right at this point and split the handle. This however was not the most serious problem as when the handle was removed it was noted that there was a crack in the body of the blade itself which started just infront of the tang and was heading up the blade. At this point the blade was retired.

Grip

The first negative noted is that the handle comes slick with a coat of varnish or similar. This makes the handle fairly slick which isn't a benefit. This is compounded as the slot cut in the handle for the tang are left with very square (essentially sharp) edges and the slippery handle plus abrasive slot makes for an abrasive combination. These issues however can be dealt with by sanding the handle coating it with linseed oil and then filling the slot with a mix of wood filler and epoxy.

Concerns were raised during discussion about this blade about using of the garden machete to split wood by using it as a froe (impact splitting). However as it could not take heavy chopping on very hard woods it is unlikely it could take significant splitting aside from as noted previously wood which is very easily to split, almost to the point it can be chop split readily.

Edge Retention

As the handle broke prematurely and the blade suffered a split then the comparative work which was planned was not completed. However just from general observation the edge retention was significantly superior to blades like the Junglas for pure wood cutting which would be expected as the garden machete has an edge which is significantly harder and has a higher carbide volume but not so much of either that it suffers micro-chipping. The edge wears very slowly and sharpening takes very little work as the edge just suffered light dulling in general no micro-chipping.

Sharpening

As the edge does not tend to take significant damage during wood working (when used with proper technique) sharpening usually only requires very fine stones. The procedure is simply to :

The lapping of the front flat grind can be done only with the shaping stone, in most cases a 1000 grit water stone was used. The edge and the lapping of the back was taken to an 8000 grit polish as since it is a chopping blade and does mainly push cuts then it would benefit in edge retention from the finest polish possibly.

Chisel Grind

This blade is advertised as a garden machete but outside of Japan that name The garden machete is quite a powerful chopping tool, easily able to compete with a quality hatchet of similar size/weight. The biggest difference is due to the chisel grind. The main drawbacks are :

The advantages are : An example of a plane cut can be seen in the video at the right which shows a fairly straightforward demonstration of the difference between working with the Junglas and garden machete making a simple point on a stake.

Overview

Overview :

Comments and references

Comments can be emailed to Knife Review : Japanese Garden Machete (nata)

Most of the pictures in the above are in the garden machete album at PhotoBucket.


Last updated : 24/01/2012
Originally written: 11:29:2011
Up